辯論賽流程英文版

　　a, shall be borne by the chairman of the debate

　　1, the debate began

　　2, announced the motion

　　3, introduce the participating team and its position

　　4, introduce team member

　　5, introduce rules, judges and staff

　　6, debate competition

　　7, the judges review

　　8, for audience questions, the judges score (simultaneous)

　　9, announced the result of the match

　　the debate over 10

　　second, the process of the debate

　　1, the theoretical stage defense:

　　(1) positive and argue against a speech made by positive and negative sides zhubian stated his own first main point. must be completed within the specified time.

　　(2) positive and opposite two apology speech square 2, against two contend with concise text focuses theoretically demonstrated their own point of view,

　　(3) positive and opposite three speech by square three, against three respectively with concise text carries on the empirical analysis, provide arguments to support his own views.

　　phase 2, free debate by tetragonal speak first, then the opposition spokesman, sides took turns to speak. (in a relatively concentrated period of time)

　　3, summarize four contend for final statement by both parties, summarizes has side view, refute each other subjective point:

　　(1) argue against four summation

　　(2) square four summation

　　4. audience member: the audience to questions of both players, players must give the answer patiently. stage performance is not recorded in the results of the competition between the two sides to ask a question.

　　5, the judges scoring stage

　　6, the judges review the process of both views and debate.

　　7, the announcement

　　three, the rules of the debate

　　1, each member must be finished within the prescribed period of time, over time, in accordance with abstained processing, and lose from team total score 5 points.

　　2, free debate rules free debate speech must alternates between the teams, the first to speak with a member of tetragonal, then one by opposition players, the two sides take turns, until you run out of time. (each a free debate in the concentration of two hours to complete, what time each other, each stick words between 60-800 words, can only ask a question at a time.)

　　fourth, criteria

　　(a) will be hired to review all the five judges of the game.

　　(2) criteria

　　1, point clear, argument is sufficient, citing appropriate, analyzed thoroughly.

　　2, grabbed the other views and error, precedents and precise, and to the point.

　　3, reflect agile, strong ability to deal with.

　　4, articulate, level clear, tight logic.

　　(3) the scoring method (group and individual scores respectively, out of 100)

　　(1) the topic: can the logic, theory, from the position held by the fact that such as multi-level and multi-angle, argument is sufficient, reasoning is clear, whether for his own difficulties with effective treatment methods.

　　(2) the argument: if there is a convincing argument, argument is sufficient, whether logical reasoning process, the fact whether the reference is proper, true.

　　(3) dispute: to ask whether to grab the key, the problem simple. no questions or questions within the time required, should be appropriate. the question of whether or not to answer each other, can you give a person the sense with justified. don't answer or not answer should be penalised accordingly.

　　(4) : whether to have team spirit, mutual support, debate cohesion is closely. whether q&a form an organic whole, to a powerful blow to the other party.

　　(5) argue the wind: the language and debate style exquisite civility. personal attacks will be made to argue each other friends and netizens.

　　(4) points: every topic, argument, dispute, cooperate, argue the wind project, do not conform to the requirements of the evaluation and in violation of the rules, are appropriate. due to the fault causes of incidents affect the game, is decided by the jury, in a 5-10% reduction of its cumulative total score.

　　(5) score project group and individual points per game comparison table is as follows:

　　(6) score project group and individual points per game of appraisal form

　　(7) good debater respectively by the outcome of each race scores are the highest return. the game of "best debater" tired integral calculation by the individual scores the highest gain, formula is: the total integral/attend the session.

　　(8) the outcome of judgment

　　1, the outcome of the game, on the basis of a few judges play group points, remove the a and a minimum points, calculating the remaining points scored an average of judgement.

　　2, debater individual scoring points calculation method, calculation method with groups only as an individual award review basis, has nothing to do with judging each outcome.

　　five, awards and incentives

　　1, every game are selected each a good debater each team, will decide after the game one of the best debater.

　　一、由辯論會主席承擔

　　1、辯論賽開始

　　2、宣布辯題

　　3、介紹參賽代表隊及所持立場

　　4、介紹參賽隊員

　　5、介紹規則、評委及工作人員

　　6、辯論比賽

　　7、評委點評

　　8、觀眾自由提問，評委評分(同時進行)

　　9、宣布比賽結果

　　10 辯論賽結束

　　二、辯論過程

　　1、辯方陳詞立論階段：

　　(1)正、反方一辯發言先由正反雙方主辯發出陳述本方主要觀點貼。必須在指定的時間內完成。

　　(2)正、反方二辯發言正方二辯、反方二辯以簡潔文字重點從理論上論證己方觀點;

　　(3)正、反方三辯發言由正方三辯、反方三辯分別以簡潔文字進行實證分析，為本方觀點提供論據支持。

　　2、自由辯論階段由正方首先發言，然后反方發言，正反方依次輪流發言。(在相對集中的時間內進行)

　　3、總結階段由雙方四辯進行最后陳述，總結已方觀點，反駁對方主觀點：

　　(1)反方四辯總結陳詞

　　(2)正方四辯總結陳詞

　　4、觀眾提問：觀眾對雙方隊員進行提問，隊員必須給予耐心解答。提問階段雙方的表現不記入比賽成績。

　　5、評委評分階段

　　6、由評委對雙方觀點及辯論過程進行點評。

　　7、結果宣布

　　三、辯論規則

　　1、每位隊員必須在規定的時間內完成，超過時間按照棄權處理，并從所在團隊總分中減掉5分。

　　2、自由辯論規則自由辯論發言必須在兩隊之間交替進行，首先由正方一名隊員發言，然后由反方一名隊員發言，雙方輪流，直到時間用完為止。(每一場的自由辯論在集中的兩個小時內完成，每場的具體時間另定，每貼的文字在60--800字之間，每次只能提一個問題。)

　　四、評判標準

　　(一) 將聘請五位評委對本次比賽進行全程評議。

　　(二) 評分標準

　　1、論點明晰，論據充足，引證恰當，分析透徹。

　　2、迅速抓住對方觀點及失誤，駁論精到，切中要害。

　　3、反映敏捷，應對能力強。

　　4、表達清晰、層次清楚，邏輯嚴密。

　　(三)評分辦法(團體和個人分別記分，滿分均為100分)

　　(1)審題：對所持立場能否從邏輯、理論、事實等多層次、多角度理解，論據是否充足，推理關系是否明晰，對本方的難點是否具有有效的處理方法。

　　(2)論證：論證是否有說服力，論據是否充分，推理過程是否合乎邏輯，事實引用是否得當、真實。

　　(3)辯駁：提問能否抓住對方要害，問題簡單明了。在規定時間內沒有提出問題或提問不清，應適當扣分。是否正面回答對方的問題，能否給人以有理有據的感覺。不回答或不正面回答應相應扣分。

　　(4)配合：是否有團隊精神，是否相互支持，論辯銜接是否緊密。問答是否形成一個有機整體，給對方一個有力打擊。

　　(5)辯風：所用語言和辯論風格講究文明禮貌。不得對對方辯友和網友進行人身攻擊。

　　(四)扣分：凡審題、論證、辯駁、配合、辯風項目中，不符合評判要求和違反規則的，均酌情扣分。由于參賽隊自身原因造成的突發事件影響比賽的，由評判團決定，在其累計總分中扣5-10%。

　　(五)評分項目每場比賽的團體分和個人分的評比表格如下：

　　(六)評分項目每場比賽的團體分和個人分的評比表格

　　(七)每場比賽的優秀辯手分別由勝負雙方得分最高者獲得;本次比賽的“最佳辯手”由個人累積分計算分數最高者獲得，公式為：總積分/參加的場次。

　　(八)勝負判斷

　　1、每場比賽的勝負，依據幾位評委所打團體分，去掉一個最高分和一個最低分，計算剩余分數的平均分判定。

　　2、辯手個人得分計算方法同團體分計算方法，只作為個人獎項的評審依據，與判斷每場勝負無關。

　　五、獎項與獎勵

　　1、每一場比賽均評選出優秀辯手每隊各一名，整個比賽后將決出一位最佳辯手。