季度考核的英文自我評價(jià)（通用3篇）

季度考核的英文自我評價(jià) 篇1

　　In the use of direct superior performance evaluation system, the purpose of employee self-assessment is nothing more than two: 1, the fastest quantitative data sources can be quantified; 2, reflects the staff participation in performance appraisal; However, if the assessment of employees Assessment without a clear understanding of it, it will lead to significant deviation of the assessment results, or even failure. We know that the performance appraisal may be a variety of errors, such as the different leaders of different personal scales, the average tendency, etc., then the self-assessment link, which led to the factors that lead to errors it?

　　First, the personality of each person is different from the self-assessment scale is very different. For example, some employees self-confidence, their own evaluation of high, some people feel inferior, their evaluation on the low side. In addition, some people pursue perfection, strict requirements on their own, and some others have passed, these two categories of people to their own scale certainly different. Also, some old employees of the company and colleagues know very clearly, scoring when its capability, and new employees do not know other people's shallow depth, to their scoring when there is not much reference to speak of.

　　Second, psychological research shows that most people are overconfident."Do not make a normal fool," an example of this book mentioned that we often hear a lot of people say that they "not on the phase", that is, according to the photos did not look good. In fact, the photo is an objective reflection of our appearance, and each of us in the mirror when it will be special (and may be unconscious or habitual) to choose the best angle, that is more than a layer of subjective Factors in it, which led to our look in the mirror look better than the photos. So in fact, the staff part of the self-assessment on the provision of such a "mirror" to our staff to the beauty, this error which is self-evident.

　　Third, the staff self-assessment of the score, the assessment will do a great impact on the scoring. Have the experience of "bargain" people know that if you see the stall on a package, and my heart that probably worth 100, but the mouth asking price, the boss said 500, if you really want this package, bigMost people only dare to 300 or 400 pieces to cut. This is the so-called "anchor effect", the negotiation inside the "first offer, without anger in each other's situation, the higher the better" is the meaning, because the first bid will greatly grasp the initiative, so that the other psychological expectationsResulting in great changes. Employee self-assessment actually gave the examiner a chance to take the lead in the bidder, and whether the assessment due to face or other considerations, are likely to be the "quote" effect, so that the assessment results error. We in the actual work of human resources, but also did find this phenomenon, a company several departments staff performance appraisal scores, without exception, no less than its self-rated scores.

　　Based on the above analysis, we will find that the department leaders get the self-evaluation scores mixed with too many subjective factors, so that can not be filtered through technical means, and this score will have a great impact on the assessment; Confident employees have a high score, and sometimes due to the need for mandatory distribution, those who require their own strict, scoring low staff has become a victim, because their scoring low, the final score is difficult to be brought up leadership. In the assessment of the indicators can not quantify the more components, or different departments in different parts of the work of employees, the lack of uniform measure of the time, this situation is particularly serious.

　　So, companies in the performance evaluation of the actual operation, how to solve these problems I mentioned above? Many people may be from the "increase the proportion of quantifiable indicators," "to strengthen the assessment and assessment of those who training, But in practice, it will only increase the workload and complexity of performance appraisal, implementation easier said than done? In fact, just look back to see the implementation of the two purposes of self-evaluation .Self-evaluation and implementation of self-evaluation, , We will find a simple solution: the relatively objective quantifiable indicators, the implementation of "employee self-evaluation", while maintaining a "fast data source" - in fact only data sources, but also embodied in the form "Employee participation"; and not to quantify the subjective evaluation of indicators, the assessment by the direct scoring, do not give employees self-evaluation (and thus in this link error) opportunity.

　　We know that performance appraisal in human resources work is a huge project, the implementation of the highest cost, companies should seize the main contradiction, step by step, and in the initial stage, but not for the form of trapped. So is slightly Jun policy for some enterprises initially set up performance management system, simply cancel the self-evaluation session, thus avoiding the link error, but also to a certain extent reduce the workload and complexity of the assessment for the next Step smooth implementation of the well prepared.

　　Of course, the front said that the main business in the initial stage of performance management situation. When companies meet the following conditions: First, the implementation of the more smooth performance management, implementation costs can be effectively controlled; Second, the formation of a good performance within the company culture, we understand the performance management is more uniform, their own evaluation More objective; Third, the department leaders generally have a clear understanding of the lower levels and independent judgments; we can think that enterprises have entered the advanced stage. At this point to carry out a real staff self-assessment, it will further mobilize the enthusiasm of employees and the importance of performance, thus forming a virtuous circle of performance management.

季度考核的英文自我評價(jià) 篇2

　　在政治思想方面，我堅(jiān)定不移地?fù)碜o(hù)黨制定的各項(xiàng)方針政策，學(xué)習(xí)五中全會(huì)會(huì)議精神。在師德方面虛心向老教師學(xué)習(xí)請教，從中學(xué)習(xí)高尚、嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)慕處燂L(fēng)范。

　　在教育教學(xué)方面，我以嚴(yán)要求高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來衡量自我，不斷給自我施壓，主動(dòng)參加各級各類的教學(xué)活動(dòng)。教學(xué)中，針對學(xué)生特點(diǎn)，以愉快式教學(xué)為主，不搞滿堂灌，堅(jiān)持學(xué)生為主體，教師為主導(dǎo)、教學(xué)為主線，注重講練結(jié)合。同時(shí)，認(rèn)真做好作業(yè)批改和輔導(dǎo)工作。

　　在紀(jì)律方面，本人嚴(yán)格遵守學(xué)校的各項(xiàng)規(guī)章制度，不遲到、不早退、有事主動(dòng)請假。在工作中，尊敬領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、團(tuán)結(jié)同事，能正確處理好與領(lǐng)導(dǎo)同事之間的關(guān)系。

　　在教學(xué)成績方面，隨著新課程改革對教師業(yè)務(wù)本事要求的提高，本人在教學(xué)之余，還擠時(shí)間自學(xué)中文本科并積極參加各類現(xiàn)代教育技術(shù)培訓(xùn)。教學(xué)成績得到了教研組內(nèi)其他教師的一致認(rèn)可。我所帶的班級，總體來說，成績較好。

　　當(dāng)然，作為一名青年教師，我在工作中還存在17種植煌晟浦處，俗話說：“金無足赤，人無完人�！痹诮窈蟮墓ぷ髦�，我會(huì)“多學(xué)習(xí)、多動(dòng)手、多思考、多評價(jià)、多反思”，以期更大的提高。

季度考核的英文自我評價(jià) 篇3

　　20__年__社區(qū)在第一季度工作在，區(qū)政府區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)局的正確領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下，以創(chuàng)新求發(fā)展，使統(tǒng)計(jì)工作取得了新的進(jìn)展和成效�，F(xiàn)將工作評價(jià)如下：

　　一、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)重視、正確決策

　　1、社區(qū)黨工委定期召開會(huì)議，研究統(tǒng)計(jì)工作，每季度定期召開計(jì)劃統(tǒng)計(jì)工作專題研究會(huì)，聽取統(tǒng)計(jì)工作匯報(bào)，在人、財(cái)、物上大力投入。堅(jiān)持黨政一把手親自抓，分管領(lǐng)導(dǎo)各部門齊抓共管。梅塘社區(qū)在年初工作意見中明確了統(tǒng)計(jì)工作職責(zé)，并將履行統(tǒng)計(jì)職責(zé)分工情景納入年度重點(diǎn)目標(biāo)職責(zé)管理中，進(jìn)一步完善和落實(shí)了履行統(tǒng)計(jì)職責(zé)分工職責(zé)制，強(qiáng)化了統(tǒng)計(jì)工作的綜合治理機(jī)制。

　　2、強(qiáng)化基層隊(duì)伍建設(shè)，明確社區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)員的工作職責(zé)，既做到各負(fù)其責(zé)，又做到共同配合，在社區(qū)構(gòu)成了“納入社區(qū)、深化教育、服務(wù)為主、綜合治理”的統(tǒng)計(jì)工作新格局。一年兩度的社區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)員業(yè)務(wù)培訓(xùn)，保證了統(tǒng)計(jì)工作的開展。定期與不定期的對社區(qū)進(jìn)行排查摸底，日常走訪、發(fā)放宣傳品等實(shí)質(zhì)性工作，將基礎(chǔ)工作和管理服務(wù)做在日常，大大提高了對社區(qū)企業(yè)及個(gè)體業(yè)戶數(shù)量及質(zhì)量的掌握。為后期開展打下了良好的基礎(chǔ)。

　　二、深化改革，建立屬地管理

　　以統(tǒng)計(jì)工作基礎(chǔ)建設(shè)為重點(diǎn)，加強(qiáng)分類指導(dǎo)和動(dòng)態(tài)管理，規(guī)范工作程序，落實(shí)管理措施，實(shí)現(xiàn)統(tǒng)計(jì)工作由管理主導(dǎo)型向服務(wù)主導(dǎo)型的轉(zhuǎn)變。全面推進(jìn)統(tǒng)計(jì)工作管理體制改革，建立單位負(fù)責(zé)、屬地管理、社區(qū)服務(wù)的新體制。

　　1、認(rèn)真貫徹落實(shí)各部門履行職責(zé)分工職責(zé)制，全面落實(shí)單位法定代表人(負(fù)責(zé)人)統(tǒng)計(jì)工作職責(zé)制。年初，我們對轄區(qū)企業(yè)、個(gè)體工商業(yè)戶進(jìn)行了排查摸底，根據(jù)各單位實(shí)際情景有針對性的進(jìn)行幫忙和指導(dǎo)，使屬地管理、單位負(fù)責(zé)落到實(shí)處。

　　2、加強(qiáng)統(tǒng)計(jì)工作計(jì)算機(jī)管理質(zhì)量，以科學(xué)手段到達(dá)科學(xué)管理的目的。首先，我們加強(qiáng)對轄區(qū)工商業(yè)戶的管理，每月到工商、稅務(wù)了解新注冊、注銷的企業(yè)，并全部進(jìn)行了微機(jī)錄入。

　　三、加強(qiáng)陣地建設(shè)，確保工作順利開展

　　進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)陣地建設(shè)，發(fā)揮社區(qū)資源的綜合優(yōu)勢，建立了多渠道、多形式、服務(wù)主體多元化的統(tǒng)計(jì)工作體系

　　1、社區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)人員確保一人一機(jī)并保證了網(wǎng)絡(luò)暢通，配備電話機(jī)、打印機(jī)、辦公柜等相關(guān)辦公設(shè)施。

　　2、為社區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)人員配備統(tǒng)計(jì)標(biāo)牌、文件盒、文件夾，獨(dú)立宣傳欄等。

　　四、職能聯(lián)動(dòng)，實(shí)現(xiàn)信息共享

　　社區(qū)定期召開各職能部門聯(lián)席會(huì)議，使各單位承擔(dān)起職責(zé)，各司其職，相互配合。工商、稅務(wù)及時(shí)供給名錄庫資料，工商、公安協(xié)助進(jìn)行市場、個(gè)體戶清查摸底。切實(shí)加強(qiáng)行政管理資料交換、信息共享、普查溝通和協(xié)調(diào)等工作。

　　五、依法管理，確保數(shù)據(jù)的準(zhǔn)確性

　　隨著統(tǒng)計(jì)工作的要求越來越高，為使統(tǒng)計(jì)工作更加軌道化，更加法制化，工作中我們處處以學(xué)習(xí)宣傳貫徹統(tǒng)計(jì)法為先導(dǎo)，以執(zhí)行統(tǒng)計(jì)法為重點(diǎn)，全面提高依法行政水平。

　　社區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)員能夠熟悉和掌握統(tǒng)計(jì)法等相關(guān)法規(guī)條例的基本資料及指示精神，從而進(jìn)一步提高了統(tǒng)計(jì)員對政策法規(guī)的掌握和運(yùn)用本事，防止上報(bào)數(shù)據(jù)出現(xiàn)瞞、漏、遲報(bào)現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生。

　　六、強(qiáng)化全局意識(shí)，進(jìn)取努力完成上級下達(dá)各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)任務(wù)

　　在20__年第一季度，__社區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)員努力協(xié)調(diào)各相關(guān)職能部門關(guān)系，克服種.種困難，確保上級普查任務(wù)按時(shí)、保量的完成。進(jìn)取協(xié)調(diào)企業(yè)，參與上級部門組織的統(tǒng)計(jì)上崗、繼續(xù)教育培訓(xùn);

　　七、存在問題下個(gè)季度工作打算

　　1、在區(qū)劃調(diào)整后，對轄區(qū)企業(yè)的管理與服務(wù)還存在漏洞。將進(jìn)一步進(jìn)行規(guī)范化管理。

　　2、信息管理不夠完善。將創(chuàng)新工作方法，建立社區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)，使信息數(shù)據(jù)部門共享。

　　3、克服經(jīng)濟(jì)普查清查階段問題，全力以赴完成經(jīng)濟(jì)普查工作任務(wù)。

　　在今后的工作中，我們將進(jìn)一步增強(qiáng)業(yè)務(wù)知識(shí)，扎實(shí)有效地做好基層基礎(chǔ)工作，抓好各項(xiàng)制度的落實(shí)，努力提升統(tǒng)計(jì)工作的管理和服務(wù)水平，使社區(qū)統(tǒng)計(jì)工作再上新臺(tái)階。

　　以上就是我們__社區(qū)，第一季度的工作評價(jià)，請領(lǐng)導(dǎo)批評指正。