精選英語辯論題目
英語辯論賽越來越普遍，大家一定還是需要一些英語辯論題目的。下面是小編搜集整理的精選英語辯論題目，歡迎閱讀。更多資訊請繼續關注辯論賽欄目!
英語辯論題目
CLASS assignment at a Guangzhou university has provoked controversy after local press reported that a professor asked students to design a hypothetical plan to rob a bank. The professor said the same assignment had been used at the Harvard Business School to train students how to manage human resources.
Many shocked commentators have criticized the assignment as absurd. They suggest that it may even encourage students to commit crime. Such a project wouldn't have any educational value, they argue. Others say that robbing a bank is not necessarily an innovative idea for a college class project; it only shows that the educator has run out of legitimate ideas and methods.
However, a greater number of other commentators support the project. They suggest that such unconventional methods will capture students' imaginations and make the class more interesting.
Students, too, came to the professor's defense, saying it was a very inventive project from which they learned a lot.
Do you think this is a project that should be assigned to a college class?
Yes
It won't turn students into bank robbers. There's no need to make such a fuss over it.
1. College students are adults with a well-grounded sense of right and wrong. Simply being asked by a professor to write a plan for robbing a bank isn't going to provoke them to do carry it out.
2. Not every lesson in a college class has to be about morals or social values. Academic freedom means professors can give students assignments like this, as long as they are challenging and educational.
3. The main problem with the Chinese educational system is its lack of innovation and fresh ideas. Students have been taught for decades to simply recite and repeat. This project is an example of educational innovation and should be encouraged, not criticized.
No
There are better ways to be innovative in the classroom than designing a bank robbery.
1. A bank robbery, however hypothetical, usually involves violence. Although college students probably wouldn't carry out such an act, encouraging them to plan violence is inappropriate.
2. There are better ways to stimulate students' imagination and critical thinking. The fact that the professor chose this particular case means that he is not sensitive enough to the students' real needs.
3. Just because the assignment was used at a US college doesn't mean it's suitable for a Chinese university class. Borrowing "revolutionary" educational methods from abroad without adapting them to the situation in China can lead to problems.
hypothetical假設的
innovative創新的
legitimate合理的
recite背誦
延伸閱讀：英語辯論賽流程
1、主席致辭：宣布辯題及辯題相關背景資料;介紹選手包括學院、專業、年級及正反方所持觀點等;介紹評委及比賽規則。
2.、比賽階段：
1)正方一辯發言(7分鐘)
第一分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第六分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第七分鐘結束時---舉牌提示
2)反方一辯發言(8分鐘)
第一分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第七分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第八分鐘結束時---舉牌提示
3)正方二辯發言(8分鐘)
第一分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第七分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第八分鐘結束時---舉牌提示
4)反方二辯發言(8分鐘)
第一分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第七分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第八分鐘結束時---舉牌提示
5)反方一辯總結(4分鐘)
第一分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第三分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第四分鐘結束時---舉牌提示
6)正方一辯總結(5分鐘)
第一分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第四分鐘結束時--舉牌提示,第五分鐘結束時---舉牌提示
注意事項:
在提示牌提示結束后,有20秒寬限期,發言者必須在此期間內完成自己的發言,如果超過寬限期,則扣分.如果發言者發言時間遠遠少于規定時間,則評委會將此看作沒有充分展開自己的觀點而給發言者扣分.
在前1-4環節中,對方可以根據發言者正在申訴的論點提出本方的觀點(point of information,簡稱為POI)提問者提出POI的注意事項:
1)POI要簡短，切題，機智。嚴禁針對比賽規則和個人提出問題;
2)提出POI時要從座位上起立，并舉手示意.提問者可以用類似on that point,Sir/Madam的話引起發言者的注意;
3)發言者可以采取以下方式回應對方提出的POI:語言拒絕(類似sorry)、接受提問(類似ok);
4)如果提出POI的要求被發言者接受，那么POI的陳述要以澄清事實或提出評論為形式，用一兩句話在15秒內表達出來;如果被發言者拒絕，那么提問者坐回原位，準備下一次提問;
5)POI只能在前四個環節中提出，最后兩個環節不能提出，前四個環節內第一分鐘和最后一分鐘內不可以提出POI;
6)發言者如果接受POI，那么就應針對提問并圍繞自己的發言回答問題;
7)除非要提出POI，否則沒有輪到發言的辯手不得在別人發言時起立。如果辯手違反規則提問或有擾亂正常比賽的行為，那么此選手將被主持人宣布犯規;
8)評價POI的提出是否得當，應該看它對正反兩方接下來的辯論的影響如何;
9)發言者在發言時須至少接受2次POI，提問者至少要站起4次示意提POI。辯手若沒有抓住機會提POI或者在發言中沒有接受POI，評委可酌情扣分;
3、觀眾提問:觀眾可向正反方各提一個問題，由雙方選派一名選手作答。該環節在正式比賽結束后進行，增加比賽觀賞性，不影響比賽結果。
4、評判團評議裁決：由一名評委進行點評，向辯論賽主席遞交比賽結果。附評分標準
5、評分標準
1)內容:觀點陳述明確，有條理，論點和論據內容是否正確、充實，引用資料和實例是否恰當。 30%
2)技巧:語言連貫，反應迅速，辯手語言是否流暢，說理、分析是否透徹，反駁和應變能力是否強，說服力和邏輯性是否強。 20%
3)各隊在POI環節中的識辯能力、說明能力和邏輯性是否強，接句是否合適，回答是否中肯，反驅是否有力、有理，反應是否機敏，用語是否得體。 20%
4)遵守比賽規則，準確把握時間。 10%
5)形象氣質：儀表，著裝整齊辯手的表情、動作是否恰當，是否有風度及幽默感。 10%
6)團隊合作：全隊各辯手的論點是否一致，結構是否完整，隊員之間的配合、合作是否默契。 10%